<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible spam, what do you think?</title>
	<link>http://blog.garethjmsaunders.co.uk/archives/2005/06/19/possible-spam-what-do-you-think/</link>
	<description>The Revd Gareth J M Saunders' weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://blog.garethjmsaunders.co.uk/archives/2005/06/19/possible-spam-what-do-you-think/#comment-5888</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.garethjmsaunders.co.uk/archives/2005/06/19/possible-spam-what-do-you-think/#comment-5888</guid>
					<description>Good tip, Steve.  Most of these are getting picked up by MS Outlook 2003 on my system and automatically junked.  But wiping them from the server first obviously saves bandwidth, and is a neater solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tip, Steve.  Most of these are getting picked up by MS Outlook 2003 on my system and automatically junked.  But wiping them from the server first obviously saves bandwidth, and is a neater solution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.garethjmsaunders.co.uk/archives/2005/06/19/possible-spam-what-do-you-think/#comment-5886</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.garethjmsaunders.co.uk/archives/2005/06/19/possible-spam-what-do-you-think/#comment-5886</guid>
					<description>Given your health over the last few weeks, I would suggest that Garethjmsaunders Antivirus is particularly ineffective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given your health over the last few weeks, I would suggest that Garethjmsaunders Antivirus is particularly ineffective.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
